
UNDERWATER
SURVEY OF
ALANYA –
GAZIPASA
(
HAKAN ONIZ
(Technical Head of AASAM )
TRNC – May 2002
Mediterranean Underwater
Archaeological Research Center (AASAM), which works for Turkish Ministry of
Culture, started doing underwater archaeological research on the Turkish
Mediterranean coast in 2002.
As
for the first part of the research, the Alanya-Gazipasa shores of the
Archaeologists
and students of archaelogy from the Antalya museum, Mediterranean University,
Eastern Mediterranean University, Anatolian University and Aegean University
and members of ASAD (Underwater Archaeological Research Assocation – Istanbul)
started their first dives in Gazipasa on 1 March 2002.
The scientific director is Metin
Pehlivaner, the manager of the
During
the dives on
As a
result of the investigation in the Selinus antique city, which is situated 2
km. away from the bedrock, it’s predicted that two different kinds of conglamera
were used in many buildings in the city. The dark colored conglamera
could have been taken from this bedrock in the north-east of
THE
Iotepe is inside the borders of the Alanya district,
33 km. away from the center of Alanya and 8 km. away from the Gazipasa
district. It was named after Iotape, the wife of the 4th Kommagane
king Antiochus (A.C. 38-72).
The
Ioatepe harbour is one of the few harbours between Alanya and Anamur that are
closed to the winds blowing from the east, west and north.
Some
of the team members have been appointed for drawing on land and in the sea in
order to complete the plan of the harbour and the environs. During these
studies three platforms with suitable depths and with connections to the main
land that could be used as the pier for the loading and unloadings the ships
were detected.
During the
dives with scuba equipment, the 2 and 4 person teams combed the inner section
of the harbour with 10 m. parallel lines. During these dives many findings made
the team members happy. The Team 2 that consisted of Mine Yapicilar, Yasin
Aygunduz, Unal Demirer and Hakan Oniz found the first stone anchor and the iron
anchor that was near the stone anchor. As a result of the combings with the
same method 8 stone anchors (ITP 01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08), 1 line weight (ITP
09) (1), 1 couple and 1 single lead cipo (ITP10,11) that belonged to wooden
anchors, pieces or a whole of 5 iron anchors (ITP 12,13,14,15,16) and 2 fixed
weights (ITP 17,18) were detected.
During these the position of the finding
was kept and they were drawn and photographed where they were. Afterwards the
position of the findings was marked by buoys and also marked on the plans. Buoys was also used to coordinate with GPS. The GPS that was
used was a Garmin standard hand GPS. However, it is unlikely that it is
perfectlty accurate on such findings that are very close to each other. During
a rescue excavation or another research it will be safer to use the plan that
shows that position of the findings.
Hakan Öniz –
AASAM hakan.oniz@emu.edu.tr

IOTAPE FINDINGS
– ITP 11 ( LEAD
CIPO THAT BELONGED TO WOODEN ANCHORS )

GEORGE BASS`
(1) E.Galili, U.Dahari, J.Sharvit 1993 IJNA 22.1, S
61 - 77
(2) National Geoprahic – Türkiye, March 2002 S 161 –
164
(3) For Dating and lokalization: H.Öniz, Çapalar,
Teknoloji ve Sınıflandırmaları, AASAM 2000